This is my own list of must read books – alphabetical by title – which will be added to as I discover must read books
- A gentle madness: bibliophiles, bibliomanes and the eternal passion for books, Nicholas A Basbanes
- The alchemist, Paulo Coelho
- A Passion for Books : A Book Lover’s Treasury of Stories, Essays, Humor, Love and Lists on Collecting, Reading, Borrowing, Lending, Caring for, and Appreciating Books,Harold Rabinowitz
- A short history of nearly everything, Bill Bryson
- Bel Canto, Ann Patchett
- Bird by bird, Ann Lamott
- The book of imaginary beings, Jorge Luis Borges
- The book thief, Markus Zusak
- Captain Corelli’s Mandolin, Louis de Bernieres
- The colour purple, Alice Walker
- The crusades through Arab eyes, Amin Maalauf
- Eucalyptus, Murray Bail
- Edward Lear’s book of nonsense, Edward Lear
- Farenheit 451, Ray Bradbury
- The gathering, Ann Enright
- The God of small things, Arundhati Roy
- Great expectations, Charles Dickens
- Heart of darkness, Joseph Conrad
- The historian, Elizabeth Kostova
- The hunchback of Notre-Dame, Victor Hugo
- Labyrinth, Jorge Lui Borges
- The library of Babel, Jorge Luis Borges
- Mao’s last dancer, Li Cunxin
- Midnight’s children, Salman Rushdie
- The mismeasure of man, Stephen Jay Gould
- The name of the rose, Umberto Eco
- Nine parts of desire, Geraldine Brooks
- One hundred years of solitude, Gabriel Garcia Marquez
- The polished hoe, Austin Clarke
- Pride and prejudice, Jane Austen
- The red tent, Anita Diamant
- A thousand splendid suns, Khalid Hosseini
- The time travelers wife, Audrey Niffenegger
- Things fall apart, Chinua Achebe
- Tuesdays with Morrie, Mitch Albom
- Ulysses, James Joyce
- Voices from slavery: 100 authentic slave narratives, Norman Yetman
- Voyage around the world, James Holman
- War and Peace, Tolstoy
- War of the Worlds, HG Wells
- Wuthering heights, Emile Bronte





June 11, 2010 at 5:30 pm
Unfortunately, the Mismeasure of Man is more a work of propaganda than science. It is a popular book because it tells people what they want to hear, but it got seriously panned in specialist academic journals. Gould misrepresents the position of those he criticises and omits studies that contradict his argument.
I’d recommend Nevan Sesardic or John Carroll’s articles below. Also, see Ian Deary’s recent paper in Nature for an up to date take on psychometrics and intelligence.
Philosophy of Science that Ignores Science: Race, IQ and Heritability, Philosophy of Science 67 (2000), pp.580-602.
http://www.ln.edu.hk/philoso/staff/sesardic/getfile.php?file=POS-2000.pdf
Also, see John Carroll’s review in relation to factor analysis, or David Bartholomew’s Measuring Intelligence: Facts and Fallacies.
http://www.psych.utoronto.ca/~reingold/courses/intelligence/cache/carroll-gould.html
The neuroscience of human intelligence differences
IJ Deary, L Penke, W Johnson – Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2010 – nature.com
http://www.larspenke.eu/pdfs/Deary_Penke_Johnson_2010_-_Neuroscience_of_intelligence_review.pdf